History of 5G and what people should know

The 1996 Communication Act gave the telecom industry freedom to move forward in the development and installation of cell towers. The act also provided protection so that the industry could not be challenged on esthetics, placement, and health issues.

Since that time the telecom industry has aggressively moved forward by initiating House Bills to further restrict the constitutional land rights of cities and counties regarding 5G. In 2017 House Bill HB 17-1193 was passed in Colorado to come into compliance with the federal laws. Currently there are House Bills HR 1060, 1069 and 1074 along with numerous additional House bills initiated by the telecom industry to diminish our remaining rights to contest the deployment of small cell antennas facilities in our communities.

What exactly is 5G? 5G stands for fifth generation wireless communication. It would enable what’s known as “The Internet of Things.” The industry is making claims that the new technology will be faster. However, the actual speed, energy consumption, and safety is being challenged.

How is 5G different from what we have now? 5G networks include a combination of a range and variety of signals. 4G “small cell” networks will be the backbone of 5G, and the new 5G antennas will be mounted on poles with current 4G antennas. New cell phones and devices will have multiple antennas that can toggle back and forth between these technologies.

The differences between 5G technology compared to 2G, 3G, & 4G is that it employs millimetre wave technology, which are narrow wave lengths. These are the same frequencies used by the Department of Defense in crowd dispersal gun control weapons, called Active Denial Systems.

But is 5G really safe? For the past two decade there has been a growing concern and movement around the world regarding the effects of EMFs Cell towers, 5G, and satellites to humans, animals, insects and the environment. Many countries have said “no” after their citizens experienced immediate health issues upon installation of 5G.

There are thousands of studies that have proven EMF exposure is dangerous and that close proximity to cell towers has been linked to many health issues, including cancers.

There are no studies that 5G is safe. When representatives of the telecom companies were questioned in US senate hearings as to whether there were any safety studies performed, their answers were that there are none.

Based upon the inadequate safety standards, the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) appears to act in the interest of the telecom industry more so than the consumer. Currently the Children Health Defense and the Environment Health Trust, two well respected non-profit, are in lawsuits against the FCC for not updating EMF safety standards for the past 25 years. The same standards are being applied to 5G.

In 2019 a group in the state of New York called the Irregulators sued the telecom carriers for misappropriating billions of dollars in taxes which were collected over a 16-year time frame. A decision was made in favor of the Irregulators.

One of Telecom strategies has been to recruit lawyers to be experts in laws pertaining to the FCC. Unfortunately, many of these lawyers have a loyalty to the telecom industry. They often give advice that communities are powerless in stopping 5G. This is not accurate. There are many communities in the US and around the world who are in the process of either stopping or delaying 5G until long- and short-term safety studies are provided.

If 5G is allowed to be installed, there will be no choice of opting out. We will be bathed in these electromagnetic frequencies on a 24/7/365 basis. This level of EMF saturation has been shown to be harmful to all living things.

Another negative consequence of 5G is the probability of your property value being lowered if a cell tower is installed on your land or rooftop. Since 5G EMF waves are short, the cell towers need to be installed every 500 – 1000 feet.

Tom Lankering and Kathleen Fors are local health professionals and members of Colorado for Safe Technology. For more information go to http://www.Co4safetech.com. They are doing a monthly series on 5G networks for The Aspen Times, with the next installment on May 9.

Read More

AirPods and Ringing in Ears -Tinnitus

  • Apple’s AirPods Pro and other wireless headphones emit small amounts of radio-frequency radiation. So do cellphones.
  • Scientists still aren’t sure if the dose is enough to harm us, and the studies they’ve done so far suggest that radiation from cellphones (which is a far greater amount than what Bluetooth devices emit) isn’t leading to more cancer.
  • The evidence we have so far suggests that consumers should probably be more worried about jamming something noisy into their ear canals every day than the radiation those devices emit.

If you’ve been on the internet lately, you might’ve heard that you should be worried about how Bluetooth headphones, such as Apple’s $250 AirPods Pro, are affecting your risk of developing cancer.

The short answer: Everybody, calm down. There’s nothing especially harmful about Bluetooth radiation compared with other electronic devices. Still, like many of the other electronics that surround us, scientists can’t say for sure this wireless technology is 100% harm-free.

The hubbub stems largely from a Medium blog post that came out earlier this year. The post cites Jerry Phillips, a biochemist who has studied DNA damage from electromagnetic fields. His research suggests it’s possible, but not certain, that electromagnetic-field activity might be messing with human DNA in a harmful way and that people should limit their exposure as a result.

“My concern for AirPods is that their placement in the ear canal exposes tissues in the head to relatively high levels of radio-frequency radiation,” he said.

There’s no conclusive evidence that AirPods Pro or other Bluetooth headsets are dangerous.

There’s really no evidence that radio-frequency (RF) radiation can cause brain cancer or noncancerous brain tumors in people.

The author of the post also said that, in 2015, a group of more than 200 international scientists sent an “appeal” to the United Nations and the World Health Organization “expressing ‘serious concern’ about the non-ionizing electromagnetic field (EMF)” that is emitted by Bluetooth devices, such as AirPods.

That’s true, but the letter in question didn’t specifically mention Bluetooth devices or headphones.

The scientists behind that letter are concerned about all kinds of electronics that emit nonionizing electromagnetic fields — the energy waves that travel at the speed of light in many electronics, including cellphones, WiFi devices, smart meters, baby monitors, and broadcast antennas.

“EMF Scientists have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to radiation from wireless devices and antennas from all sources, including the pulsed digital signals Bluetooth transmits,” Elizabeth Kelley, the director of the International EMF Scientist Appeal, told Business Insider in an email.

However, most other scientists still hesitate to say there is conclusive evidence that the small doses of radiation from cellphones and Bluetooth headsets are dangerous.

Airpods And Emf, Airpods Emf Radiation, Airpods Emf Rating, Airpods Emf Reddit, Airpods Pro Emf, Airpods Pro Emf Level, Airpods Pro Emf Radiation, Apple Airpods And Emf, Apple Airpods Pro Emf Radiation, Are Airpods Bad For Radiation, Are Airpods Emf Free, Are Airpods Safe Emf, Do Airpods Emit Emf, Do Airpods Give Off Dangerous Radiation, Do Airpods Give Off Emf, Does Airpods Emit Emf, Does Airpods Give Off Radiation, Emf Waves Airpods

Read More

Headphones and Ringing in Ears -Tinnitus 

Electromagnetic fields are invisible areas of energy produced by electricity. Our wireless headphones, used mostly with Bluetooth, emit a specific type of non-ionizing EMF called radio frequency radiation.

In the year 2015, an appeal was made by 247 scientists from 42 countries to the World Health Organization and the United Nations to adopt stricter guidelines for electromagnetic fields exposure from wireless devices to reduce the health risks that stem from them. The scientists warned that there are several health risks associated with the use of wireless devices like Bluetooth headphones. Exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by wireless devices can cause cancer, genital damage, neurological disorders, memory defects, learning problems and reproductive issues.

Electromagnetic fields are invisible areas of energy or radiation produced by electricity. Our wireless headphones, used mostly with Bluetooth, emit a specific type of non-ionizing EMF called radio frequency radiation (RFR). In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified this type of radiation as harmful to humans. Another study in 2018 revealed that exposure to such radiations could cause cancer in rats. While discussions on making the guidelines stricter goes on, the big question is how to keep yourself safe from these radiations. Here are a few precautions you can take.

Use the speakerphone

If you are on calls for a very long period of time due to work or even personal reasons, using the speaker phone may be the best option for you, to avoid potential health risks that come with the use of Bluetooth or wireless headphones. People who enjoy listening to music or podcasts should also use the speakers, and not wireless headphones to listen to their daily dose of entertainment.

Use wired headphones

Another option that you can use, if not the speaker phone is wired headphones or earphones, though speakers would be the more preferred choice here. People who stay on calls or listen to something on their phones for long hours should avoid the use of wireless, Bluetooth headsets.

Keep them away from children

Children have vulnerable bodies – small heads, thinner skulls and naive nerves. They are particularly at a greater risk of developing any such problems if exposed to these harmful electromagnetic radiations. It is extremely important to keep them away from wireless headphones and headsets and inculcate habits that include the least use of smartphones. If they want to watch cartoons and movies, they must do so only on speakers.

Do not use your phone on low signal

According to experts, when your phone has low signal, it emits more of such radiations that are harmful to your health and body. It is advised that you do not use your phone when the signal is poor, and instead only use it when the signal is stable and strong.

Keep your phone away

You must keep your phone away, as often as possible and not sleep with it around your head. You must also keep it at a distance from your face, all the time. It is impossible to completely avoid these radiations, but reducing the use of phones may help keep the potential health risks at bay.

Disclaimer: Tips and suggestions mentioned in the article are for general information purposes only and should not be construed as professional medical advice. Always consult your doctor or a professional healthcare provider if you have any specific questions about any medical matter.

Can Emf Cause Ringing In The Ears, Can Emf Cause Tinnitus, Can Wifi Cause Ringing In Ears, Does Emf Cause Tinnitus, Earbuds Emf Radiation, Ears Ringing Emf, Ringing In Ears And Emf

Can Electromagnetic Waves Cause Tinnitus, Can Emf Cause Ringing In The Ears, Can Emf Cause Tinnitus, Can Magnets Help Tinnitus, Can Wifi Cause Tinnitus, Does Emf Cause Tinnitus, Emf Cause Tinnitus, Emf Sensitivity Tinnitus, Emf Tinnitus Reddit, Tinnitus And Emf, Tinnitus Emf-exposure, What Are The Symptoms Of Emf Exposure

Read More

Tinnitus and Cell Phones: the Role of EMF

Introduction

Tinnitus is a multi-factorial condition and its prevalence has increased on the past decades. The worldwide progressive increase of the use of cell phones has exposed the peripheral auditory pathways to a higher dose of electromagnetic radio frequency radiation (EMRFR). Some tinnitus patients report that the abusive use of mobiles, especially when repeated in the same ear, might worsen ipsilateral tinnitus.

The emfTESTS digital HologramChi are frequencies infused Holograms encoded with very specific frequencies to mitigate harmful EMF.

Electromagnetic fields

Many people suffer from nonspecific symptoms, and some attribute their conditions to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed replacing the term ‘electromagnetic hypersensitivity’ with the term ‘idiopathic environmental intolerance with attribution to EMF’ in order to avoid the suggestion of a causal relationship, which has not been generally proven.

In a recent survey in Austria by Schrottner, 3.5% of the population considered themselves to be sensitive to EMF, and 70% believed that electromagnetic pollution could be a risk factor for disease. About 30% expressed some concerns about being near mobile phone base stations or power lines. Media triggered the hypotheses in 24% of the cases.

Huss surveyed general practitioners in Switzerland about their experience with patients complaining of EMF-related symptoms. About 69% of general practitioners reported seeing a patient with EMF complaints. These physicians reported that ‘sleep disorders’ were the most common complaint (43%), followed by headache (39%), difficulty concentrating (21%), and fatigue (14%). Other symptoms included tinnitus, tumors, anxiety, and nervousness. Physicians thought that about 50% of the complaints and attribution to EMF were plausible.

SBS is an affliction in which ‘lethargy’ is a core symptom. However, significant excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) or insomnia does not seem to be a part of the syndrome. The degree to which chemical or biologic (mold, endotoxin) factors contribute is unclear.

Results

EMRFR can penetrate exposed tissues and safety exposure levels have been established. These waves provoke proved thermionic effects and potential biological and genotoxic effects. Some individuals are more sensitive to electromagnetic exposure (hypersensitivity), and thus, present earlier symptoms. There may be a common psychophysiology between this hypersensitivity and tinnitus.

Conclusion

There are already reasonable evidences to suggest caution for using mobile phones to prevent auditory damage and the onset or worsening of tinnitus.

 

Read More

EMF Concerns – Electric Car

However, my focus is health – and this is what most concerns me regarding vehicles, and electric vehicles (EVs) in particular.

All vehicles have a metal body. In fact, steel makes up the vast majority of your vehicle (frame, roof, floor, exhaust pipes and more). Metal is not only a conductor of electricity, it also acts like a Faraday cage, keeping EMFs inside your car, preventing their exit.

These EMFs are produced via your car’s electronics, as well as blue tooth/wireless systems, and any cellphones that happen to be ‘on’ in the car. Not only are you in extremely close proximity to these frequencies, but the frequencies are actually amplified inside the car, with the walls of the car acting like a resonator.

I have written about EMFs in the past, and the harm they pose to biological organisms. But, for a quick recap: human-madeEMFs pose a very real threat to us and all living organisms. The health impacts of long-term exposure include neurological effects (such as poor memory, focus, sleep disorders, anxiety, and depression), inflammation, cardiovascular dysfunction, fatigue/reduced thyroid function, infertility, and DNA breaks (cancer-causing).

Also, important to note: international and Canadian EMF safety guidelines are based on industry-funded research, are extremely outdated, and are woefully inadequate to protect our health. Over the past 20 years a robust body of independentresearch has shown significant negative biological impacts from exposure to EMFs.

Now, let’s contrast this with an EV. EVs pose a significantly larger risk due to the greater number of electronic devices, and the battery (plus electric coils).

EV cars use a large capacity battery that operates up to 650 volts DC (direct current), compared to a petrol-based car with circuits that operate at 12 or 24 volts. The EV battery is usually situated behind the passenger seats in the back of the car – the area where children, who are particularly sensitive to electromagnetic radiation, are seated. Another area of high radiation is the footwell in front of the driver’s and front passenger’s seats.

These elevated EMFs increase dramatically when the battery is charging, making it imperative that you are notin the car when it is charging.

There is a severe lack of good (available) research on EMF exposure in cars. Although there are plenty of articles ‘debunking’ these dangers. However, these articles are generally funded by the automotive industry and are looking at extremely weak EMF guidelines for reference.

This quote from Theodore P. Metsis PhD (electrical, mechanical and environmental engineer) neatly sums up how I view the situation:

“EMFs in a car in motion with brakes applied + ABS activation may well exceed 100 mG. Adding RF radiation from blue tooth, Wi Fi, the cell phones of the passengers, the 4G antennas laid out all along the major roads plus the radars of cars already equipped with, located behind, left or right of a vehicle, the total EMF and EMR fields will exceed any limits humans can tolerate over a long period of time.” 

I spend a fair bit of time driving, so I have tried to reduce my EMF exposure as much as possible. I drive an older model car, so there are fewer electronic devices (no parking assist, no front or rear object sensors, no video screens), and I have disabled the blue tooth system. My phone is always off in the car.

And, when I have passengers, I have implemented one important rule: your cell phone must be ‘off’. Additionally, to further reduce the effects of EMFs, I always travel with my HologramChi mitigation device, which converts EMFs into biocompatible frequencies.

Read More

Ears Ringing and Other Symptoms Been Linked to Mobile Phones

Some people complain of ears ringing, fatigue, and dizziness or concentration difficulties, symptoms which have been suggested to be triggered by exposure to radio frequency fields. Such complaints have raised concern that certain individuals may be more sensitive than others to electromagnetic energy. This self-reported condition has been referred to as electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).

Studies on electromagnetic hypersensitivity fall mainly into two categories. Some focus on reports from people who say radio frequency fields are making them ill. Others look for an increase in symptoms among populations near mobile phone base stations.

The latter include a 2006 Austrian study that measured radio frequency fields in bedrooms of homes within 600 meters of mobile phone base stations. The residents, who did not know the exact nature of the study, were divided into three groups based on their level of exposure and questioned about 14 symptoms. Reports of three symptoms – ears rining , cold hands and feet and trouble concentrating – were significantly more common in the highest exposure group.

Another study compared a group of healthy people exposed to radio frequency fields with a group who were not exposed and found no increase in symptoms. The participants did not know which group they represented. Similar studies found no consistent proof of ability to detect fields, neither in healthy people nor in people reporting symptoms.

In 2005, the World Health Organization conducted a workshop on radio frequency exposure. The consensus was that although symptoms described as electromagnetic hypersensitivity are real and may be severe and disabling, a relationship between symptoms and radio frequency field exposure has not been proven.

A 2003 study that received considerable attention found people more likely to suffer anxiety, depression, insomnia and other mental distress when they are exposed to radio frequency fields similar to those generated by base stations used in third-generation mobile networks (UTMS). The study was widely discussed because of the implications for the new technology. Follow-up studies were initiated in several countries including one published in 2006 that used a larger study group and better methods and found no effect on symptoms. There was no link between perceived field strengths and actual radio frequency exposure.

Overall, scientific studies have thus failed to provide support for a relationship between exposure to radio frequency fields and self-reported symptoms. Present knowledge suggests that symptoms are not linked to exposure to radio frequency fields, but few studies have addressed this issue directly. The exposure levels from base stations are very low compared to the exposure during the use of a mobile phone. Research regarding health effects from base stations is mainly driven by concern in the general population.

The symptoms attributed to radio frequency fields (RF) and extremely low frequency (ELF) fields– such as those generated by power lines – are similar and in many cases the individuals complain that both fields trigger symptoms. There are more studies on self-reported symptoms and exposure to ELF fields, but as for radio frequency fields the scientific studies have failed to confirm a causal link

Read More

What is the difference between emf and voltage?

Q: What is the difference between EMF and voltage?

A: Contrary to the other answers, and despite being measured in the same units – the voltage and EMF are not the same thing.

Consider a metal ring placed on the core of a coil:

When you energize the coil with an AC, there will be a current flowing in the ring. Obviously, the ring is resistive, so there must be some force pushing the electrons against the resisitance, otherwise they won’t flow. This is precisely an electromotive force, or EMF. But how about a voltage? There will be no voltage in a ring. The electric field generated by the magnetic flux will not be a potential field (it will have a swirl) and the voltage is by definition a difference of electric potentials, thus if a given field configuration has no potential the voltage cannot be defined.

If you opened the ring the electrons would still be pushed (thanks to the EMF still present) but they would have to gather up and stop at one end of the now-open ring, and that accumulation of the electrons would generate a voltage difference between the ends of the ring (you can connect the AC voltmeter probes to the ends of the ring and it would indicate some voltage). But here the voltage would be a side effect of the charges that are blocked from moving, so a secondary effect. Obviously if the charges are stopped that means the EMF and the force from the voltage difference created must balance each other and cancel out (that explains why the voltage and EMF will measure to equal values despite not being the same thing).

So – the EMF is what pushes you down the slope, and the voltage is a height difference between the top and bottom of the slope. But, not all of the slopes do have a top and bottom:

Read More

Ringing in ears and Ear Buds – EMF Connaction

EMF Radiation comes from all our wonderful wireless devices.

From our laptops, our cellphones, our WiFi ‘s–it’s not great but this invisible tech toxin is just a by product of our digital world.  In the case of Bose Sleep Buds the EMF radiation comes from Bluetooth energy, which is used to to deliver soothing audio directly into your ears.

I and many others believe (and science is confirming it) that this artificial RF radiation is harming our bodies. The easiest way for me to explain why is that we are all electromagnetic beings, our body’s energy is affected by the electromagnetic energy in our environment– so I like to think of EMFs as just one more pollutant or toxin or irritant in our environment that’s messing with my body’s energy.

Now here’s the thing about Bose Sleep Buds: people use to help them fall asleep and stay asleep, and many people are seeking relief from ringing in the ears–known as ‘tinnitus’.

Tinnitus is really annoying and hard to live with, and especially hard to sleep with!

Just like that clicking tock you barely notice during the day, tinnitus seems louder when you’re in a quiet room–like you are when you’re in bed, trying to go sleep.  Many people use sound machines or fans to attempt to mask the sound of their own Tinnitus.

That’s why the Sleep Buds are particularly appealing to people with Tinnitus, and I’m very sympathetic, but remember– they give off EMF radiation. Not only that, but they actually funnel that EMF radiation directly into your ear– which means it not only has the potential to affect the delicate audio nerves of your ear, but the ear canal is also a direct pathway to the brain. This, from Wikipedia: The cochlear nerve carries auditory sensory information from the cochlea of the inner ear directly to the brain.

What If Their Bid For Relief Could Be Sending More of What’s Actually Causing Their Tinnitus Directly Into Their Ear? Ringing in The Ears and Insomnia are Known Symptoms of EMF Radiation Exposure

There’s a sickness that it’s estimated up to 10% of the world wide population has today.  It’s called Electromagnetic hypersensitivity or EHS. A lot of people try to claim it’s not real, but I can assure you- I’ve had it for decades and it’s very REAL. To this day, if I put my body in the path of too much wireless energy, I’ll get little static jolts, then a headache, numbness,  dizzy and light-headed. Even The World Health Organization has a page devoted to EHS


Common symptoms of EHS include headaches, concentration difficulties, ringing in the ears, sleep problems, depression, rashes, lack of energy, and flu-like symptoms.

Many of people are having reactions to wireless energy, but don’t realize that EMF radiation is the cause of their symptoms. Ronald Powell, Ph.D did research on what happened to people when a wireless Smart Meter was installed,Symptoms After Exposure to Smart Meter Radiation.”  We have the report recap as well as the percentage of people who reported the amazing, critical and varied symptoms that are commonly associated with people who are sensitive to EMF.

Dr. Powell is a retired career U.S. Government scientist. He holds a Ph.D. in Applied Physics from Harvard. During the Government career, he worked for the President, the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. When it comes to EMF Radiation effects, he’s an incredible wealth of information, as well as someone we trust and honor in our field for his exceptional EMF education work.

 

The fact is, evidence pointing to the dangerous nature of EMFs is continuing to grow, and people deserve to be informed of the facts so that they can make choices in light of that evidence, instead of in the dark.  

More and more evidence in the form of studies and research is coming to light about how exposure to wireless EMF radiation is causing more than just symptoms.

At this point, there can be no honest doubt that man-made, artificial  RF or EMF radiation has biological effects. The research section of our site lists links to hundreds of peer-reviewed studies you can read if you’re interested in further education.

There’s a study that addresses Radio Frequency Radiation or RF from wireless devices(like Bluetooth signals coming from Sleep Buds) titled,

Tinnitus and cell phones: the role of electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation. After reviewing 165 articles on the biological effects of wireless radiation exposure, the authors conclude,

Emf Exposure Wifi, Emf Radiation And Tinnitus, Emf Radiation Cancer, Emf Radiation Causes, Emf Radiation Cell Phone Case, Emf Radiation Cell Phones, Emf Radiation Cell Towers, Emf Radiation Computers, Emf Radiation Earbuds, Emf Radiation Reduction, Emf Radiation Router, Emf Radiation Sensitivity, Emf Radiation Wired Headphones

Read More

Tinnitus and Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity

Introduction

Ears Ringing (emf tinnitus) can occur because of electromagnetic radiation, some people are sensitive to electromagnetic fields (EMF). EmfRelief can help with our quantum patent technology to mitigate harmful frequencies from your environment.

Tinnitus, the perception of sound in the absence of an external sound, is a frequent disorder of auditory perception, which is very difficult to treat [1]. Tinnitus as a phantom perception of a meaningless sound has to be differentiated from auditory hallucinations which mainly occur in the context of psychiatric diseases and are characterized by e.g. the perception of voices. About 10–20% of the adult population experiences some degree of tinnitus. Many learn to ignore the sounds and experience no major effects, but for about 1 in 100 adults, the noise interferes significantly with daily life [2]. In those patients, tinnitus is frequently associated with neuropsychiatric co-morbidity such as depression, anxiety or sleep disorders [3][4], which underlines the clinical and socio-oeconomic importance.

Even if the pathophysiology of tinnitus remains incompletely understood, there is growing evidence that dysfunctional neuroplastic processes in the brain are involved. In particular, it is assumed that tinnitus might be the correlate of maladaptive neuroplastic changes due to distorted sensory input [5][6]. Accordingly functional imaging studies demonstrated neuroplastic alterations in the central auditory system [7][8]. However tinnitus related alterations of neural functioning are not limited to the central auditory system, but also encompass non-auditory regions such as frontal and limbic areas [9][12].

There has been an ongoing debate, whether tinnitus might be related to exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) [13]. One previous study found a tinnitus prevalence of 14% in a sample of electromagnetic hypersensitive subjects [14]. Whereas electromagnetic hypersensitivity per se is not a proxy variable for EMF-exposure, substantial evidence from electrophysiological studies has shown EMF and especially mobile phone emissions to influence cognitive function [15] and neuronal processing in the central auditory system [16][20]. These might represent potential mechanisms by which EMF could contribute to the development of tinnitus. However, two recent epidemiological studies from a student and a the general population, respectively, did not demonstrate a significant relationship between mobile phone use and tinnitus [21][22].

Besides the hypothesized involvement in the generation of tinnitus, EMF-exposure has also been related to a variety of unspecific health symptoms (e.g., dizziness, fatigue, headache, sleep disturbances, etc.). Despite a huge amount of studies investigating the health impact of EMF, no clear relationship between EMF-exposure and these unspecific health symptoms could be established and the majority of provocation studies failed to demonstrate such a relationship [23]. Based on the fact that some individuals suffer from a variety of symptoms, which they attribute to EMF-exposure, whereas the overwhelming majority does not experience any symptoms under the same EMF-exposure, the concept of “subjective electromagnetic hypersensitivity” evolved [24]. This subjective electromagnetic hypersensitivity is characterized by health complaints, which interfere with daily living and are subjectively attributed to electromagnetic fields of named emission sources (e.g., mobile phone base stations, hot spots, TV-sets, etc.). Very recent data from an epidemiological case-control study suggest that this subjective electromagnetic hypersensitivity is characterized by dysfunctional cognitions, reduced discrimination ability for sensory stimuli [25] and increased sensitivity of a cortical network encompassing the anterior cingulate and insular cortex [26].

Due to the large sample size, the detailed clinical and neurobiological characterization and the control group, which was matched for age, gender and either living surroundings or workplace (as very rough proxies for EMF-exposure), this study population [25] was well suited to investigate the relationship between tinnitus, subjective electromagnetic hypersensitivity and EMF-exposure. In detail, we addressed the following questions: 1.) Do subjective electromagnetic hypersensitive people suffer more often from tinnitus than controls? 2.) Are there clinical characteristics that point to potential common pathological mechanisms?

How To Protect Yourself From Electromagnetic Waves, What Are The Side Effects Of Electromagnetic Radiation Can Wifi Cause Ringing In Ears, Can Wifi Make Your Ears Ring, Does Wifi Cause Ringing In The Ears

Read More

EMF Cause Ringing In the Ears?

Can EMF cause ringing in the ears?

Some individuals have reported a wide range of non-specific health problems that they attribute to low-level exposure of electromagnetic fields (EMF). The symptoms most commonly reported include headaches, body pain, lethargy, tinnitus (ringing in the ear), nausea, burning sensation, heart arrhythmia and anxiety.

EMF Radiation Sources

Anything that uses or transports electricity generates an electromagnetic field, including high voltage power lines, household appliances, radios, televisions, cordless telephones, cell phones and towers, computers, and microwave ovens. The frequencies of these fields vary by the source, but most fall within the GHz (gigahertz) ranges employed by cell phones and Wi-Fi systems.

Cells in our bodies generate their own small fields. Neurons (nerve cells) and muscle cells pass information from cell to cell using small electrical charges, or microvoltages. External electromagnetic fields can interfere with these signals.

Self-reported rates of EMF hypersensitivity vary from 1.5% in Sweden, where the condition is officially recognized as a disability, to 3% in Calfornia, 4% in the UK, and 5% in Switzerland. (1)

In Sweden employers and building owners are expected to rectify EMF problems, and sufferers are entitled to disability benefits. The Canadian Human Rights Commission also considers EMF hypersensitivity an environmental sensitivity and a disability.

EMF and Tinnitus

Recently, German scientists studied the relationship between electromagnetic fields (EMF) and tinnitus in a 2009 study. Tinnitus occurrence and tinnitus severity were assessed by questionnaires in 89 electromagnetic hypersensitive and 107 controls matched for age, gender, living surroundings, and workplace. Tinnitus was significantly more frequent in the electromagnetic hypersensitive group (50.72 percent vs. 17.5 percent), whereas tinnitus duration and severity did not differ between groups.

The researchers concluded, “Tinnitus is associated with subjective electromagnetic hypersensitivity. An individual vulnerability probably due to an over-activated cortical distress network seems to be responsible for both. Hence, therapeutic efforts should focus on treatment strategies (e.g. cognitive behavioral therapy) aiming at normalizing this dysfunctional distress network.
Microwave Hearing

The microwave auditory effect, also known as the microwave hearing effect, consists of audible clicks (or, with modulation, whole words) induced by pulsed/modulated microwave frequencies. The sounds are generated directly inside the human head without the need of any receiving electronic device. The effect was first reported by persons working in the vicinity of radar transponders during World War II. These induced sounds are not audible to other people nearby.

Many people improve when the offending RF source is removed from their environment.

Negative EMF Hypersensitivity Studies

 Two systematic reviews of EMF hypersensitivity were performed in 2005 and 2008. The 2005 review concluded, “Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is unrelated to the presence of EMF, although more research into this phenomenon is required’” (2) The 2008 study found “no evidence that EMF hypersensitive individuals could detect presence or absence of RF-EMF better than other persons.” (3)

These studies both found that participants who claim EMF hypersensitivity were unable to discern when EMF radiation was present and when it was not. I have no way to determine whether these studies were conducted in isolation from background EMF interference; this was not discussed in the abstracts or conclusions. But if they were conducted in hospitals or clinics, the results are problematic. Such facilities are full of equipment which generates electromagnetic fields, from wiring to imaging equipment. Studies should be conducted far away from any background EMF contamination.

Studies Supporting EMF Hypersensitivity

More recent studies connect EMF hypersensitivity with numerous symptoms, prominently including tinnitus. In one study more than half the subjects with self-reported EMF hypersensitivity also reported tinnitus which disrupted sleep and work. (4) Other symptoms included fatigue, nausea, headaches, loss of memory and concentration, skin problems, insomnia, seizures, and dizziness – and perhaps also cancer, ADD, migraines, arrhythmia, and Parkinson’s disease.

An early study by William Rea, MD, and his associates at the Environmental Health Center in Dallas, Texas, found an effective way to evaluate EMF hypersensitivity in patients. (5) In this case, monitoring devices were used to ensure that extraneous EMF would not interfere with the tests.

One hundred patients who complained of EMF hypersensitivity across frequencies ranging from 0 to 5 MHz were tested. Twenty-five patients responded to the presence of fields and did not respond to bogus or empty fields. These were then included in a study, along with 25 volunteers who did not complain of hypersensitivity. None of the volunteers responded to the presence or absence of fields, but 16 of the EMF-sensitive patients (64%) had positive signs and symptoms.

When these 16 patients were then re-exposed to the frequencies to which they were most sensitive in the earlier phase, they detected the presence of EMF 100% of the time, and all of the placebo tests were negative. The test was repeated with the same results. The authors concluded, “This study gives strong evidence that electromagnetic field sensitivity exists and can be elicited under environmentally controlled conditions.”

In a double-blind study where outside electrical fields were strictly controlled, a single female physician, who was self-diagnosed with EMF hypersensitivity, developed temporal pain, headache, muscle twitching, and skipped heartbeats within 100 seconds of exposure to a typical environmental field of 60 Hz and 300 V/m. (6) Turning the field on and off controlled the symptoms. Her somatic reactions to EMF exposure were statistically reliable.

Can Electromagnetic Waves Cause Tinnitus, Can Emf Cause Ringing In The Ears, Can Emf Cause Tinnitus, Can Magnets Help Tinnitus, Does Emf Cause Tinnitus, Emf And Tinnitus, Emf Cause Tinnitus, Emf Exposure Tinnitus, Emf Radiation And Tinnitus, Emf Sensitivity Tinnitus, Emf Tinnitus Reddit

Read More